[There is an argument to be made against her clarification, too; that perhaps they should better understand what sort of people have been brought under ADIโs wing, the kind that cannot simply sit back and do nothing while an apocalypse hangs over them. The very assumption that reconnaissance isnโt dangerous in its own right, or doesnโt have the potential to always go pear-shaped, no matter how much a person wants to distance themselves from the action.
But even then, he has a feeling that kind of rebuttal will only go in circles โ waste the shortening ten minutes of his time. This, anyway, is one issue thatโs been on his mind since he spoke to Down.]
To be blunt? He blamed the previous derailment in 1921 on the work of โApex Detectivesโ, whose members had been seen around the railyard before the accident. Even stranger, how such a tragedy was barely more than a mention in the local papers. I believe his words were โglossed overโ and โsnuffed outโ.
Itโs a nasty implication. Not much of a moral high ground to stand on, if itโs true โ but is it?
no subject
But even then, he has a feeling that kind of rebuttal will only go in circles โ waste the shortening ten minutes of his time. This, anyway, is one issue thatโs been on his mind since he spoke to Down.]
To be blunt? He blamed the previous derailment in 1921 on the work of โApex Detectivesโ, whose members had been seen around the railyard before the accident. Even stranger, how such a tragedy was barely more than a mention in the local papers. I believe his words were โglossed overโ and โsnuffed outโ.
Itโs a nasty implication. Not much of a moral high ground to stand on, if itโs true โ but is it?